Religions v. mental health debate in the case of Zara's taking of Hijab: Philosophical Posthumanism Perspective

Paper Abstract: this research will focus on an announcement that took place in Instagram regarding one's decision to no longer wearing hijb. the statement came from public figure under the username: @camilliazr. she has full name Camillia Zara and she is the daughter of governor of West Java, Ridwan Kamil. Zara is not the pioneer in doing this action, however it became the most viral case regarding religions issue because of what she had wrote explaining her reason of action. the statement concern about the search for identity, refelction of her ffort in achieving the meaning of honesty and a bit about her family. this successfully drawn massive attention from public, even frm other public figures. although the statement and comments have conflicted relations but the intentions are good in their own way. this kind of conflict usually happened especially when deconstruction became zeitgeist. the knowledge that social law has the same construction as language law about paradigmatic and syntagmatic that contains erasure. since that, a group of people or individual struggle to get tout of this erasure. it will then result in another conflict. so what it is now? should we move backward to embrace the principle from traditional philosopher? of course not, what we must do is to move forward to see this kind of social event under the principle of philosophical posthumanism which offered quantum of entanglement theor as a second-level of deconstruction, so we can see human beyond their intentions.