Theme: 8. Negotiating Margins: Representations, Resistances, Agencies
Shane Barter
Soka University of America, United States
Handrio Nurhan
Boston University, United States
Handrio Nurhan
Boston University, United States
Shane Barter
Soka University of America, United States
Hipolitus Wangge
Australian National University, Australia
Belén García-Noblejas
Waseda University, Japan
Natalia Mikhailova
University Laval, Canada
Raghu Bista
Tribhuvan University, Nepal
Without exception, all countries must manage difference. The papers of this panel draw from experiences across Asia to show how states have tried to manage minority affairs, and how minority groups have responded. The first paper examines territorial autonomy within autocratic countries. While often written off as meaningless, the author suggests that even authoritarian autonomy brings some benefits for minorities. The second paper explores Papuan mobilization under the recent Jokowi regime in Indonesia, highlighting how minorities mobilize in semi-democratic, conflict-prone autonomous regions. The third paper examines the formation of a Tibetan nationalism through The Tibet Mirror, a Tibetan-language periodical published from India as early as 1925. This demonstrates that a Tibetan nationalism and internationalism existed early on, even before the Chinese invasion. The fourth paper examines Chinese discourse towards Xinjiang. Focusing on metaphors used by the Party helps to provide insight into how China sees Xinjiang and its people. Finally, the fifth paper examines a refugee minority pushed into home homes. While the Rohingya refugee crisis is typically understood as an issue for Bangladesh and perhaps Malaysia, this paper shows how they have fared in Nepal, examining government responses to refugees fleeing a humanitarian crisis.
Presenter: Belén García-Noblejas – Waseda University
Presenter: Raghu B. Bista – Tribhuvan University
Presenter: Shane Barter – Soka University of America
Presenter: Hipolitus Wangge – Australian National University