Theme: 2. From Oceanic Crossroads: Empires, Networks and Histories
Gaye Christoffersen
Johns Hopkins University, United States
Gaye Christoffersen
Johns Hopkins University, United States
Gaye Christoffersen
Johns Hopkins University, United States
Vitaly Kosyrev
Endicott College, United States
Pushpa Thambipillai
Independent Scholar, Malaysia
Amanda Huan
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
The panel interrogates the strategies major powers introduce to Southeast Asia, and examines how Southeast Asian states respond to them. The panel draws on diverse theoretical approaches including the Chinese School of Relationalism, Middle Power Theory, classical realism, and Constructivism. Russia has expected its role in Southeast Asia to be that of a major power with a sphere of influence, on a par with China and the United States, drawing on Realist balance of power strategies. China offers membership in the Maritime Silk Road which promises economic prosperity. The United States offers membership in the Free and Open Indo-Pacific with security assistance that promises greater security for each state. The ASEAN Way rejects major-power domination of smaller countries and gives these countries greater agency than they would have under major powers' spheres of influence. Can ASEAN states introduce a Global South consciousness and Middle Power Theory into an emerging Global IR Theory that has not fully considered its ideas? A genuine Global IR Theory project that draws on Southeast Asian views and multiple concepts from both Western and non-Western sources, extrapolating from local knowledge and generalizing to the global, could be the result.
Presenter: Gaye Christoffersen – Johns Hopkins University
Presenter: Vitaly Kosyrev – Endicott College
Presenter: Pushpa Thambipillai – Independent Scholar
Co-Presenter: Amanda Huan – Nanyang Technological University